NEW YORK, August 13, 2011/PRNewswire/-Robotics are helping surgeons make great strides in medical, and the advanced technology used in Robotic Prostatectomy procedures offers many advantages for the patient and surgeon. However, in recent news, there is some discussion on the frequency of its use. In addition, some critics are warning patients against the mass commercialization of robotic surgery and its benefits. Dr. David Samadi, Vice President, Department of urology and head of the Robotics and minimally invasive surgery The Mount Sinai Medical Center is a prostate cancer treatment Robotic Prostatectomy expert who agrees that, in some cases the technology has been oversold, but still firmly believe in the benefits of robotic surgery.
(Photo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20110812/NY51900)
Patient-level marketing on new technologies and, in particular, the robotic surgery is increasing. Hospitals nationwide are large amounts of money to get the robotic equipment and procedures, as such, are devoting significant resources to promote it. While devoted to the care and treatment of patients, hospitals are still businesses that compete with one another. The latest technology, surgeons more skilled and better facilities are all part of their marketing arsenal. A recent report in the journal for healthcare quality mainly criticized hospitals for making too much of robotic surgery on their websites. The study, designed to highlight the over marketing of surgery Robotics, accused of hospitals to rely too heavily success statistics provided by the manufacturers of robots, without revealing the potential risks of surgery robotics. "Surgical procedures present some risk," recalls Dr. Samadi. "It is important for patients to seek out the procedure, the surgeon and the hospital before making any decisions. There is so much information out there that can be difficult to sift through everything. You must choose a surgeon that you feel comfortable with. "
Robotic surgery is despised for its spending. Last month showing the information published by The Medical College of Wisconsin that State hospitals with robotic equipment just got their number of Sega's double Prostatectomy procedures for a period of three months, while the incidence has remained the same in those without technology. Some believe that surgeons and hospitals that offer robotic procedures must work for the "trick" the expense of the equipment; that hospitals may be forcing them to cover the procurement and maintenance costs. There are, however, numerous publications documenting the benefits of robotic surgery savings. For many patients, surgery Robotics reduces wards, blood loss and post-operative complications, all of which can help a patient back to their normal schedules faster.
Dr. Samadi, Robotic Prostatectomy procedures performed for ten years, is sensitive to concerns about the technology. "The equipment is expensive, but in the hands of the right surgeon can save lives." Historically, prostate removal procedures were made through invasive, open abdominal surgery. Blood loss was significant, and visibility was obstructed. "Now, using robotic surgery, can I remove the prostate and all evidence of cancer with greater visibility and greater accuracy." Dr. Samadi also reminds patients that technology alone is not the key to success. Choosing a surgeon with a solid foundation in laparoscopic surgery and open, as well as experience extensive surgery Robotics, is a must.
Beyond technology, the frequency of the procedures of Prostatectomy is often debated by "watchful waiting" supporters. Some specialists recommend that patients diagnosed prostate cancer surgery early return or other treatment modality, opting instead to keep an eye on its development before aggressively in the treatment of cancer. Dr. Samadi believes that for most patients the best course of action is to remove the prostate gland and a new study in The New England Journal of Medicine supports the beliefs of Dr. Samadi. After 700 patients with prostate cancer over a period of 15 years – half opting for watchful waiting, half for the removal of the prostate – the NEJM found that surgical removal of the prostate providing a reduction of 38 per cent of the risk of death from prostate cancer. "The benefits of survival are great," says Dr. Samadi. However, he recognizes that for a small percentage of patients, the cancer may return after radical prostatectomy procedures. "In those cases radiation can be used but only after the surgery. If a patient elects to have the radiation before the removal of the prostate, the possibility of being able to perform the surgery later are very slim. "
Dr. Samadi has performed over 3,500 successful Robotic Prostatectomy procedures and has a cure rate of prostate cancer of 97 percent. For more than 200,000 men diagnosed with prostate cancer each year, Dr. Samadi believes Robotic Prostatectomy is a very valid choice. "The message must not operate on all but the cancer does not belong there. Remove the cancer completely and know where you stand. "
More can be seen from prostate cancer expert, Dr. David Samadi, who is also part a-Fox News Medical Team.
Robotic surgery on good day New York
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr8EEhQrNl0
Comparing prostate cancer options – surgery Robotics vs watchful waiting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dC4T9JAJss
SOURCE smart-surgery.com
No comments:
Post a Comment